Monday, November 3, 2008

nutmeg

ok, so here's the thing............... i've been laying here and was thinking about the word awful, awful means something is really bad right? now dissect the word awe and full. so one could say that it is full of awe. Now think of the word awesome. and how it means something is really good or cool. but when you dissect that word it is awe and some, OR you could say it's "some" of awe..... how can two words that are so similar mean things that are so different?!?!?! so then i was thinking as to how that came to be and awe, long how one can stare in awe. but then i was trying to think of why a little of something could be so much better than full of it. I came to the conclusion that awe is like nutmeg. Nutmeg is nice if you have a little (or some) of it but not if you have a bunch of it (full). After these thoughts and conversing them with a dear friend of mine i decided to confidently declare that the two words "awesome" AND "awful" are now denied from my and the english dictionary, and how they will be replaced with "nutmegsome" and "nutmegfull" this way it will make much more sense to those people who are learning the english language and those who have used it for quite some time.

oh yes, also. the word "creep" is no longer in existence and shall be replaced with the word "sheep"

and due to the recent frustration with people sending sms text messages and predictive text, you may have noticed that when you want to write the word "cool" the word "book" comes up. to help save you time and precious energy i propose to you all that the word "cool" will be replaced with the word "book" this too makes more sense because people like it and are happier when it is warm, not cool. nobody likes things "cool" people like things "cold" but not "cool" so why might we refer to something that is pleasurable as something that society does not like? and books are very enjoyable and if your still reading this you know how cool books are and how reading is nutmegsome, and book as shit.

good mourning,
jeffrey love.

No comments: